CastleGreen Finance Closes the Largest C-PACE Project in Connecticut
Background
CastleGreen Finance is pleased to announce the closing of One Park Road, West Hartford, CT, a $13,767,000 Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) transaction. In partnership with Lexington Partners LLC, the property developer, and the Connecticut Green Bank, the program administrator for the state of Connecticut C-PACE program, CastleGreen Finance is delighted to be part of the largest C-PACE transaction to date in Connecticut.
Project Overview
For 135 years, the Sisters of St. Joseph of Chambéry have occupied a convent on Park Road in West Hartford, Connecticut. One Park Road is the redevelopment of this iconic property which will add a 292-unit multi-family housing complex on the 22-acre property while maintaining much of the greenspace and preserving the Sisters’ history and ensuring their retirement security at the property.
A new 230,000 square foot four-story building over a one-story parking deck, will be connected to the existing structures and is designed to look like a series of separate buildings while providing a neighborhood feel.
One wing of the historic convent will continue to be owned and occupied by the Sisters. The remaining 111,000 square feet of the Colonial Revival-style convent is undergoing renovation into a mix of studio, one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments.
The long-discussed redevelopment of this iconic property is the result of the partnership between the Sisters of St. Joseph, Lexington Partners, and the Town of West Hartford, and it will bring new rental housing to the fast-growing Park Road/West Hartford area. Construction on the $70 million project is scheduled to begin in mid-2021, with completion expected in the spring/summer of 2023.
CastleGreen Finance has facilitated approval of the $13.7 million C-PACE project through the Connecticut Green Bank’s C-PACE program. The project provides the project developer with access to affordable, long term financing for qualifying clean energy and energy efficiency upgrades that lower energy costs.
Martin J. Kenny, president of Lexington Partners, states, “We feel the Park Road business district is to West Hartford as Brooklyn is to New York City. The project will serve to strengthen the Park Road business district and provide a gateway to and combine with what is going on in Parkville. We needed creative financing in our capital stack to help bring this project to fruition. The CastleGreen team presented a compelling financing solution and delivered on time and as promised.”
C-PACE financing of clean, sustainable energy efficiency projects embraces the collaboration of public/private financing of energy improvements for the redevelopment of this iconic property.
Sal Tarsia, Managing Partner of CastleGreen Finance states, “Lexington Partners is a key player in the revitalization of the Park Road business district, creatively utilizing C-PACE financing for its ESG initiatives. It was a pleasure working with the Lexington team on a redevelopment which exemplifies the original purpose of what C-PACE was created for, but also respects and preserves the history of the property.”
“We are excited to see CastleGreen Finance closing their first project in Connecticut; the largest C-PACE project to date, in the state. This project is an excellent example of private capital working in the state’s open market for C-PACE financing,” said Bryan Garcia, President and CEO of Connecticut Green Bank. “The redevelopment at the Sisters of St. Joseph’s convent will not only make energy usage at the property more efficient and affordable, it will create housing opportunities and continue to support the Sisters, who strive to serve all people, especially those in need. This project will make a positive impact in West Hartford and exemplifies the Green Bank’s vision of a planet protected by the love of humanity.”
About CastleGreen Finance – www.CastleGreenfinance.com
CastleGreen Finance, in partnership with X-Caliber Capital, is a private capital source focused on Commercial PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) financing. CastleGreen Finance brings extensive experience in commercial real estate across a broad range of financial disciplines. The extensive real estate experience of the CastleGreen team, combined with its core C-PACE capabilities, provides our clients with the knowledge and resources to create a superior capital stack that meets all its needs and helps to unlock the potential of their commercial real estate. We understand that the most important part of any real estate transaction is showing up with the capital at closing. Our team focuses on the details of every deal to ensure we can get our clients to the finish line.
California Statewide Communities Development Authority (“CSCDA”)
Version 1.0 – June 1, 20121
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3
PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 2.1. Eligible Improvements…………………………………………………………………………………………………..4
- 2.1.1. Energy and Water Conservation and Efficiency Improvements ………………………………… 5
- 2.1.2. Renewable Energy Improvements ………………………………………………………………………….. 5
- 2.1.3. Resiliency ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5
- 2.2. Properties/Property Owners …………………………………………………………………………………………. 5
- 2.3. Installation of Improvements/Contractor Registration ……………………………………………………. 6
- 2.4. Lender Consent/Underwriting Requirements …………………………………………………………………. 7
TRANSACTION PROCESS……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
- 3.1. Financing Structure………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7
- 3.2. Inquiry …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7
- 3.3. Term Sheet ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7
- 3.4. Underwriting………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
- 3.5. Documentation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7
- 3.6. Closing ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8
- 3.7. Disbursements …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8
- 3.8. Assessment Repayment ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9
FEE STRUCTURE ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 HANDBOOK DOES NOT REPRESENT LEGAL ADVICE…………………………………………………………….. 9 CONTACT INFORMATION …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 EXHIBITS: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 EXHIBIT A……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 Form of Assessment Contract ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 EXHIBIT B………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………12 List of Current Administrative Fees as of June 1, 2021 ………………………………………………………….. 12
1. OVERVIEW:
The CastleGreen C-PACE program (the “Program”) is administered by CastleGreen Services, LLC (“CGS” or the “Administrator”) under a program sponsored by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the “Authority” or “CSCDA”), a joint powers authority. The Authority administers a commercial property assessed clean energy (“C-PACE”) program (the “Open PACE Program”) under the California PACE Legislation, Division 7, Chapter 29 of the California Streets & Highways Code.
The Authority is offering the Open PACE Program on a statewide basis to encourage the installation of distributed generation renewable energy sources, energy efficiency improvements, water efficiency improvements, seismic strengthening improvements and electric vehicle charging infrastructures (collectively “C-PACE Improvements”).
The Program allows commercial property owners to obtain long-term financing for eligible PACE improvements from proceeds derived from the sale of the bonds and other financing mechanisms authorized by law. It utilizes a tool that is widely used by local agencies in California to finance public benefit projects: land-secured financing. State law has long provided cities and counties with the power to issue bonds and levy assessments on the county property tax bill to finance public projects such as sewers, parks, and the undergrounding of utilities. Chapter 29 of the Improvement Act of 1911, commencing with Section 5898.10 of the Streets & Highways Code of the State, authorizes the levy of contractual assessments to finance the installation of C-PACE-eligible improvements. The assessment contract (“Assessment Contract”) is voluntary and is executed by each participating property owner and the Authority.
Under the Program, a contractual assessment lien is placed on each participating property in an amount necessary to (i) finance the installation of the PACE Improvements over a 5-39 year period, depending upon the expected useful life of the financed improvements, (ii) pay for costs of issuing bonds or other financing mechanisms and (iii) pay the costs of administering the Program. The contractual assessment installments are collected on the property tax bill of the county in which the participating property is located, and the funds are used to repay the PACE financing. If the owner sells the property, the contractual assessment obligation remains an obligation of the property.
Under the Open PACE Program, if a property owner fails to pay the annual contractual assessment installments, CSCDA is obligated to strip the delinquent installments off the property tax bill and commence judicial proceedings to foreclose the lien of the delinquent installments.
CSCDA has engaged third-party administrators, including CGS, to administer its Open PACE Program. CGS will review and process applications, register contractors, interact with third-party capital providers/lenders, and provide services to property owners who wish to participate in the Program. The Authority allows for financing mechanisms that include the issuance of assessment-backed bonds. The bonds are issued under an indenture between the Authority and a trustee for the holders of the bonds. The capital to fund improvements is provided through the purchase of bonds or other financing mechanisms and will be provided by an affiliate of the Administrator or a third-party capital provider.
C-PACE financing has several positive features that are attractive to property owners, including: Long duration, fixed rate financing. The availability of interest-only periods, provided that the bond will fully amortize by its maturity date.
- Competitive pricing
- No acceleration in an event of default
- Non-recourse to the property owner
- No due on sale provisions
- The non-ad valorem contractual assessment transfers with the property in a sale process. The Authority and/or the Administrator reserve the right to amend, supplement, or modify this Program Handbook at any time, and may suspend participation in the Program altogether. No change in the Program or California’s PACE legislation will affect a property owner’s obligations to pay C- PACE assessments incurred under the Program prior to such changes. This Program Handbook is published as of the date noted in the footer of the document and is current as of that date. 2. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS This Program Handbook identifies the Program requirements relating to the types of improvements that can be financed under the Program, eligible properties, property owner requirements and how to register contractors working with the Program.
2.1. Eligible Improvements
As permitted by California’s PACE legislation, the Program allows qualifying property owners to finance certain improvements to their commercial property.
Improvements are generally broken down into three categories, collectively described as the “Improvements” as noted previously:
- a) Energy and water conservation and efficiency
- b) Renewable energy
c) Resiliency
In accordance with the Program, minimum energy efficiency specifications are set at EnergyStar, California Title 24 and Title 20, and WaterSense standards, as applicable. Efficiency standards will “ratchet-up” with EnergyStar, WaterSense, California Title 24 and Title 20 standards, or other new standards as may be appropriate and as agreed upon by the Administrator. Eligible improvements will be verified in advance of closing as eligible under the California PACE legislation by the Administrator.
Any solar PV system must be eligible for and participate in California Solar Initiative or an equivalent utility rebate program, unless the property is not connected to the electricity grid or such utility rebate program is not available.
To qualify under the Program, all proposed improvements must be affixed to a building or facility that is part of the subject property and constitute an Improvement.
Subject to the exceptions noted in Section 2.2, the Program will finance new construction, deep retrofits, “gut rehabilitations”, or minor/moderate renovation projects. Improvements which have already been installed (or partially installed) may be eligible for Program financing on a case-by-case basis however in no instance shall this lookback period extend for more than 39 months from installation date (as determined by the Certificate of Occupancy or other documentation approved by the Administrator).
The Administrator reserves the right to impose additional qualifications on certain Improvements. This may include the acquisition of additional technical information, operational or maintenance information, or information regarding the nature of the ownership or permanent affixation to the real property.
The Administrator does not recommend or endorse any specific Improvement and participation in the Program does not constitute an endorsement, or provide any form of guaranty or warranty, with respect to eligible Improvements.
2.1.1. Energy and Water Conservation and Efficiency Improvements
Qualifying conservation and efficiency improvements are measures which reduce consumption through conservation or a more efficient use of water, electricity, natural gas, propane, or other forms of energy. Examples include (but are not limited to):
- Air sealing
- Insulation
- Energy-efficient heating, cooling, or ventilation systems
- Building modifications to increase the use of daylight
- Window replacement
- Low flow toilets, faucets, or showerheads
- Energy controls or energy recovery systems
- Electric vehicle charging equipment
- Efficient lighting equipment
- Installation of other building fixtures that can reasonably be expected to contribute to electrical or water savings. 2.1.2. Renewable Energy Improvements Qualifying renewable energy improvements are measures in which electrical, mechanical, or thermal energy is produced from a method that uses hydrogen, solar energy, geothermal energy, bioenergy, and/or wind energy. Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and leases may be eligible for PACE financing. Additional criteria apply and the initial PPA term must be at least as long as the Assessment term. 2.1.3. Resiliency Resiliency improvements generally classified as:
Seismic strengthening – a broad array of improvements and measures designed to prevent damage or destruction of a building during a seismic event.
Wildfire hardening – any improvements approved by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=SHC§i onNum=5899.4.)
Properties/Property Owners
To qualify for financing under the Program, a property and property owner must meet the following eligibility criteria:
• The property must be located within the geographic boundaries of a local government who has opted into the Program.
o For a list of current eligible local governments please see CSCDA’s Open PACE website at https://cscda.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Agency-List- 5.7.21.pdf.
• The property must be a commercial property, which is defined as (i) a property not designed for residential use; or (ii) designed for residential use, of five or more non- owner-occupied units; for projects financing new construction of a residential building containing five or more units, the initial construction must be undertaken by the intended owner or occupant.
o Depending on the legal structure and proposed scope of improvements, condominium properties, co-op ownership groups, properties subject to long- term ground leases, and properties subject to homeowner associations may be eligible on a case-by-case basis.
- The record owner must be the property owner of the property to be levied.
- The total annual property taxes and assessments cannot exceed 5% of the property’s market value.1
- At the time of closing:
o property taxes for the property must be current,
o any property-based debt must not be subject to any notices of default or other
evidence of debt delinquency,
o the combined mortgage debt and C-PACE assessments may not exceed 95% of
the market value of the property,
o the property must not be subject to any involuntary liens, judgments or defaults
or judgments in excess of $5,000, unless such liens shall be satisfied to the
satisfaction of the Administrator with the proceeds of the financing at closing.
o the property owner must not currently be in bankruptcy or have declared bankruptcy within a period of ninety days prior to the anticipated closing date of the financing.
The Administrator reserves the right to impose additional eligibility qualifications on certain properties or owners, in its sole discretion.
2.3. Installation of Improvements/Contractor Registration
The Improvements must be installed by a contractor that is registered with the Program; however, the property owner may also install his/her own Improvements and will not need to be registered. If the financing is for Improvements for which construction or installation of is complete such that the Improvements have been fully installed on the property, there is no need for the contractor to be registered with the Program.
A full list of contractors that have registered with the Program may be obtained from the Administrator and may also be found on its website. Contractors are any general contractor who has been engaged by the property owner to install the Improvements who shall provide the Administrator the following:
a) An executed Contractor Registration Agreement, as provided by the Administrator,
b) All licenses, certifications as required by the State or local Jurisdiction where the improvements are being Installed.
1 Market value may be determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, using one of the following methodologies: a) an automated valuation model (“AVM) prepared by an independent third-party, a broker price opinion or an independent appraisal performed by a licensed, independent appraiser.
c) Any additional information as requested by the Administrator from time to time.
Registration of a contractor with the Program is neither a recommendation of such contractor nor a guaranty of or acceptance of responsibility for such contractors by CSCDA, the Administrator, or the County or City where the property is located upon which the Improvements are installed.
2.4. Lender Consent/Underwriting Requirements
If a property is secured by a mortgage or other form of recorded debt, it is a requirement of the Administrator that, prior to entering into an Assessment Contract, the property owner must provide notice to and receive the written consent of any holders or loan servicers of any existing mortgages on the property.
Generally, the investor or purchaser of the bonds issued by the Authority, will perform its own underwriting in addition to the underwriting of the Administrator and the investor may have underwriting requirements more stringent than those of the Program.
3. TRANSACTION PROCESS
3.1. Financing Structure
The Authority will finance the installation of Eligible Products by issuing bonds backed by the assessments created by the Program. The proceeds from the sale of the bonds will provide capital to finance the Improvements. The term of the assessment may not exceed the useful life of the Improvements, as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion based upon information provided by any energy reviewers/auditors or industry information provided.
3.2. Inquiry
A property owner may apply with the Program for C-PACE financing by completing and submitting an Inquiry form to: [email protected]. Please find the Inquiry form at: CastlegreenFinance.com/CA Program. The Administrator shall review and request any further information it needs to evaluate the project. The Administrator will approve or deny the Inquiry, via email to the applicant, on a timely basis.
3.3. Term Sheet
After preliminary approval is granted by the Administrator a term sheet will be issued by an affiliate of the Administrator or a third-party capital provider. The term sheet will outline the terms of the proposed transaction under the Program, as well as any conditions precedent to closing. If the property owner elects to execute the term sheet (subject to any negotiated terms and conditions) the project will proceed and the property owner will work with the capital provider and the Program to begin the underwriting process.
3.4. Underwriting
During the underwriting process, the capital provider will work with the Administrator to obtain all due diligence items it requires for closing. As discussed previously, capital providers may require more information on a project than what is required under the Program by the Administrator. The Administrator will coordinate for the receipt of diligence information with the property owner and the capital provider.
3.5. Documentation
Through its participation in the Open PACE Program, the Program has worked with the Authority to assemble a package of closing documents that will be used to evidence the terms and structure of
the financing as well as the form of assessment that will be levied at closing. These documents satisfy all requirements of the Authority and the capital provider. The property owner and its counsel will review these documents and coordinate throughout the process with the Administrator and the capital provider.
3.6. Closing
Upon finalization of the documents referenced above, the Administrator will coordinate the process whereby the Assessment Contracts will be recorded in the land records of the applicable jurisdiction in which the property is located. After confirmation of recording is received, the Administrator will coordinate the closing based on the date agreed with the property owner in the Assessment Contract.
The Assessment Contract is comprised of the following amounts:
- Project Funds – include the cost of the Improvements as well as any ancillary costs that were incurred in connection with the installation of the Improvements. These costs may include the cost of energy audits, appraisals, engineering or architectural fees, etc. The Administrator will work with the property owner and the capital provider and approve all eligible Improvement costs that may be included in the total assessment amount.
- Program Costs of Issuance – there are certain fees and costs associated with closing an assessment under the Program. These include various fees to cover the costs of the Authority and its partners. These fees will be communicated to the property owner by the Program prior to closing.
- Capitalized Interest – the Program allows for interest to be capitalized into the Assessment to account for the payment of interest to the capital provider during the period (established during the term sheet negotiation) from the closing date to the date the Administrator receives its first payment of principal and interest under the bond or other financing mechanisms.
- Closing Costs – these ancillary fees and expenses will be agreed between the capital provider and the property owner and will include, for example, all legal fees and costs of the capital provider. At closing, the bond or assessment proceeds will be funded to an escrow account administered by a trustee or other qualified escrow agent engaged by the Administrator. Funds will then be available for distribution for the below:
- Project funds –Eligible Improvement costs:
- to the Property Owner for reimbursement of costs incurred to date
- to the contractor for reimbursement of costs incurred to date to the extent not included in (a) above
- Issuance Costs of the Program
- Capitalized Interest
- Other Closing Costs – fees and expenses incurred by the Program or Property Owner.
3.7. Disbursements
Unless the Project funds have been fully disbursed to the property owner on the closing date, the remaining Project Costs will be disbursed to the property owner, from time to time, according to an agreement between the capital provider, and the property owner. Disbursement requests shall be prepared by the capital provider (or its designee) and shall pertain directly to the installation of the eligible Improvements. Documentation may be required by the Administrator (in coordination with the capital provider) to evidence the expenses.
After receipt of a disbursement request (and any requested supporting documentation), the Administrator will authorize and instruct the trustee to release the requested funds be sent to the property owner or its contractor within a commercially reasonable period of time.
Once the Improvements have been fully installed, the property owner will submit a final disbursement request (such final disbursement request to serve as a form of completion certificate) to the Administrator certifying that the installation of the eligible improvements have been completed and that the Improvements are operating as designed and intended.
3.8. Assessment Repayment
Repayment of the C-PACE assessment is subject to the terms and conditions of the transaction documents which evidence the assessment. The Assessment represents a non-ad valorem tax on the property tax bill issued by the applicable County’s taxing authority.
If an assessment installment payment, is not received by the date specified on the property tax bill, the Authority has the right to have such delinquent installment, and its associated penalties and interest, stripped off the secured property tax roll and immediately enforced through a judicial foreclosure action that could result in a sale of the Property for the payment of the delinquent installments, associated penalties and interest, and all costs of suit, including attorneys’ fees.
Prepayment of the assessment shall be either in full or in part as documented in the agreements. Any notice to the Administrator prior to the prepayment or any prepayment premium (if any) which may be due shall be documented in the agreements.
4. FEE STRUCTURE
All fees for participation in the Program are detailed in Exhibit B. These fees may be reduced, increased, waived, or modified at any time, and for any transaction, at the sole discretion of the Administrator. Modification of fees payable to the Authority require approval by the Board of Directors of the Administrator prior to any modification.
Fees payable to a jurisdictional tax collecting authority may be reduced, increased, waived, or modified by that tax collecting authority as applicable.
5. HANDBOOK DOES NOT REPRESENT LEGAL ADVICE
The Administrator does not provide legal, financial, taxation, or accounting advice to any prospective property owner. No statements or representations, either in this Handbook or made as part of the transaction process, should be construed as such advice. Property owners are strongly encouraged to seek the advice of competent professionals as part of participating in the Program.
6. CONTACT INFORMATION
If you have any questions about the Program, this Handbook, or the Administrator, please contact the Administrator:
CastleGreen Services, LLC, 3 West Main Street, Suite 103, Irvington NY 10533 e-mail: [email protected]
website: castlegreenfinance.com/CAOpenPace
7. EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Form of Financing Application Exhibit B – Program Fees
EXHIBIT A
Form of Assessment Contract
11
EXHIBIT B
List of Current Administrative Fees as of June 1, 2021
Fees at Transaction Close*
Services
Provider
Fee
Program Administration Construction Management Asset Servicing Recordation | Administrator | Base Program Fees: 1% for Assessments over $1,000,000 Construction Asset Management Services: $500 per disbursement request Asset Servicing: Assessments between: $1,000,000 to $10,000,000: $10,000,000 to $25,000,000: $25,000,000 + Lien Recordation: Between $150-$200 per parcel 0.25% (25bps) 0.15% (15bps) 0.10% (10bps) Additional Fees (if applicable): For transaction related services including but not limited to: Document customization Underwriting support Fees will be confirmed prior to providing such services. |
Bond Counsel and Legal Opinion | Orrick | Standard Project Fees: Bond amounts: Up to $750,000 $750,000 – $1,125,000 $1,125,000 – $1,650,000 $1,650,000 – $2,360,000 $2,360,000 + 0.75% (75bps) ($3,500 minimum) $5,625 0.50% (50bps) $8,250 0.35% (35bps) Additional fees may apply for services beyond Standard Project Fees – such as involving counsel in property owner negotiations, revisions to Program Documents, or drafting/reviewing documents which are deemed to be outside the standard closing process. |
Authority Administration
Trustee Trustee Legal
Authority
Wilmington Trust Wilmington Trust
0.75% (75bps)
Calculated based on Project Costs and subject to a minimum fee of
$10,000 and a maximum of $250,000
TBD: Estimate $3,250 per bond/Assessment Contract as applicable $1,200 per bond
Tax Administrator | DTA | Calculated on Project Costs: Up to $1,000,000 $1,000,000 – $5,000,000 | 0.52% (52 bps) $5,200 for the first $1MM of Project Costs, plus 0.10% (10bps) of Project Costs thereafter, up to $5MM |
12
Over $5,000,000 $9,200 for the first $5MM of Project Costs, plus 0.025% (2.5bps) of
Project Costs thereafter *Unless otherwise noted all Fees will be calculated on the outstanding Assessment amount.
Bond Issuance CDIAC .025% (2.5bps) Fee
Services Trustee
Tax Roll Administration
Court Collection Fee
Provider Wilmington Trust
DTA
Local County Government
Annual Fees
Fee $1,825 per bond issuance
$50 per parcel enrolled
TBD: $500 – $1,100 per County (varies by the total number of parcels enrolled in the County)
Varies by County
13
President-Elect Biden’s Vision for the Power Sector
President-elect Joe Biden brings a marked shift in U.S. energy policy priorities, with clean energy being central to his plan. The Biden Plans to “Build a Modern, Sustainable Infrastructure and an Equitable Clean Energy Future” and “Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice” will launch a national effort aimed at creating millions of jobs, building modern and sustainable infrastructure, and delivering a clean energy future. According to the Biden campaign, the plans are designed to “modernize our nation’s electric grid, making it smarter, more resilient, and ready to meet the changing needs of a net-zero greenhouse-gas-emissions economy.” I’ve been asked several times recently what this plan includes, so I spent an entire day sifting through the Biden Plan and removing jargon in an effort to identify its key components. Its key provisions include following:
Infrastructure Investment
To build the next generation of the electric grid, President Biden will leverage existing infrastructure and rights-of-way, along roads and railways, to promote faster and easier permitting. The Biden Administration will also work with utilities to install advanced metering equipment; deploy electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure, and upgrade transmission lines to support larger regional electric markets that can distribute renewable energy.
Clean Energy Innovation
- Infrastructure investments resulting in a 100% clean energy economy and net-zero greenhouse gas emissions no later than 2050. Specifically, the vision includes a carbon free power sector by 2035.
- Creation of a new cross-agency Advanced Research Projects Agency on Climate (ARPA-C) to target affordable technologies to drive cost reductions in clean energy technologies, including battery storage, negative emissions technologies, next generation building materials, renewable hydrogen, and advanced nuclear.
- Accelerate R&D on battery technology and domestic production capabilities, with a focus on developing the domestic supply chain of batteries for EVs and the grid to compliment renewable energy resources.
- Research investments and tax incentives for carbon capture and sequestration technologies, including lowering the cost of carbon capture retrofits for existing power plants.
- Accelerate innovation in supply-chain resilience by investing in research to bolster and build critical clean energy supply chains in the U.S., addressing issues like reliance on rare earth minerals.
- Investments in the national laboratories and high-performance computing capabilities.
- Appoint FERC commissioners who will drive market reforms, like expanding regional electric markets, integrating renewables and demand-response, and promoting long-term infrastructure planning to achieve a clean energy economy.
Electric Vehicles
- Remove barriers to the use of EVs, including concerns about price, range, and access to charging stations.
- Build a national electric charging system of 500,000 public charging outlets so that Americans can drive anywhere in the United States in an EV by 2030.
- Help state and local governments plan for the widespread adoption of EVs.
- Restoring the electric-vehicle tax credit and incentivizing businesses to shift their fleets to EVs. Additionally, Biden says that he will ensure that the U.S. Department of Energy invests $5 billion over five years in battery and energy storage technology, to boost the range and slash the price of electric cars.
- The U.S. Department of Transportation will also provide an additional $1 billion per year in grants to ensure the charging stations are installed by certified technicians.
- Convene the U.S. Departments of Energy and Transportation to coordinate on special demonstration projects, e.g. testing new highways that can charge EVs while in transit, and pilot projects that use EVs as mobile energy storage units. The Departments will provide grants to cities, towns, and counties that are open to piloting new kinds of charging infrastructure.
- Enact policies to promote domestic manufacturing of EVs.
- Workforce training like the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program (EVITP).
Energy Efficient Buildings
- The Biden plan will reinstate tax credits for residential energy efficiency; it also expands tax deductions for energy retrofits, smart metering systems, and other emissions-reducing investments in commercial buildings.
- Increase investment in low-income weatherization programs and key technologies like electric heat pumps.
-
Work with local and state governments and the private sector to expand the use of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE).
- Reinstate the solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC), which will expire in two years.
The Climate Mobilization Act Overview
by Christian Bergland, Building Energy Exchange — May 9, 2019
On April 18, the New York City Council passed the Climate Mobilization Act (CMA), an ambitious legislative package aligned with the City’s 1.5°C Climate Action Plan. This plan represents New York City’s commitment to the carbon draw-down targets set out in the Paris Agreement, pledging the city to carbon neutrality by 2050. Central to the Climate Mobilization Act is Local Law 97, First-of-its-kind legislation placing emissions limits on New York City’s large buildings, both commercial and residential.
A new department, the Office of Building Energy and Emissions Performance, will be charged with implementing and enforcing CMA policies. This department, headed by a design professional, will work in concert with City agencies and offices towards successful realization of the CMA’s goals. To this end, Local Law 97 also includes provisions for the creation of an advisory board tasked with hammering out detailed recommendations on the bill’s effective implementation and enforcement.
Requiring that buildings do their part to meet 80 x 50’s GHG reduction goals, Local Law 97 outlines two introductory compliance phases, with an initial period of 2024-2029. While some CMA specifics are set to be determined by the new department, initial compliance limits are fairly rigid, and are set to target those New York City buildings with the highest emissions intensity levels. Limits for the second compliance period of 2030-2034, meanwhile, are in line with the City’s interim emissions reduction goal of 40% by 2030 (40 x 30). The Office of Building Energy and Emissions Performance will have some discretion in determining the compliance path and the carbon calculation process through the rule-making process, but the 40% reduction limit is explicit in the legislation, with a requirement that any adjustments to emissions limits be at least as stringent as those laid out in the bill.
In addition to Local Law 97, the Climate Mobilization Act includes a number of other laws geared towards moving New York City’s buildings towards the City’s 80 x 50 goals, including:
- Local Laws 92 & 94 – Green Roofs & Solar PV: Requiring green roofs solar PV systems on certain new construction and renovation projects. Local Law 95 – Building Labeling: Adjusting metrics used for letter grades assessing building energy performance.
- Local Law 96 – PACE: Establishing clean energy financing tools for building owners (more on this below).
- Local Law 98 – Wind Energy: Obliging the Department of Buildings to include wind energy generation in its toolbox of renewable energy technologies.
Thankfully, there are resources to help building owners navigate this evolving regulatory landscape. The NYC Retro Accelerator supports building owners’ efforts to improve their buildings’ energy efficiency. At the state level, NYSERDA has a number of programs geared towards putting buildings on the path to energy efficiency. And, of course, Building Energy Exchange is here to ensure that building owners have a thorough understanding of options to improve their buildings’ energy usage profiles.
Does Local Law 97 apply to my building?
The bill broadly applies to buildings 25,000 square feet and larger, or to two or more buildings on the same tax lot together exceeding 50,000 square feet. Excluded from the bill are houses of worship, buildings with one or more rent-regulated units, and other forms of affordable housing.
How are emissions limits determined?
Emissions reduction targets are in line with the roadmap set out in the 1.5°C Climate Action Plan, and represent a 40% carbon reduction by 2030 and an 80% carbon reduction by 2050 relative to 2005 levels. Limits are assigned according to building occupancy type, with accommodations made for energy-intensive facilities involved in healthcare. Emissions limits for both the first and second compliance periods may be adjusted through the rule-making process. Limits are set to become significantly more stringent during the second compliance period, evidenced by the table below. Local Law 97 allows for these limits to be adjusted by rule-making, it mandates that any adjustments must be at least as stringent as the emissions limits put forth in the bill.
*Limits for 2035-2050 period will be determined by the Office of Building Energy and Emissions Performance, but the legislation sets out a citywide average emissions intensity target of 0.0014 tCO e/sf/yr for all covered buildings by 2050, a roughly 60% reduction beyond the 2024-2029 limits.
Building emissions are determined according to designated greenhouse gas coefficients for various fuel types. While the bill assigns coefficients for the initial compliance period, those for subsequent compliance periods will be determined via the rule-making process. Local Law 97’s emissions reduction targets, including its increased stringency from 2030 onward, is premised on New York City’s electric grid becoming much cleaner in the future. A cleaner grid will allow building owners to tap into emission savings by converting from polluting carbon-fueled building systems to cleaner systems powered by electricity from the grid. Large-scale offshore wind farms, increased solar capacity, linkages with Quebec hydro-power, and movement towards a decentralized grid together promise to
modernize our grid and increase electrification’s viability as a sustainability measure.
How can I pay for necessary building improvements?
Local Law 96 of the Climate Mobilization Act lays the groundwork for a property assessed clean energy (C-PACE) program. C-PACE financing is tied to a property rather than property owners, meaning that repayment obligations are transferable when a property changes ownership. This distinction helps mitigate property owners’ concerns about upfront costs relative to long-term energy savings.
Does the bill include any alternative compliance pathways?
Yes, the bill includes several alternative compliance pathways to help building owners meet their carbon reduction mandates, including:
Carbon Offsets During the first compliance period, up to 10% of a building’s annual emissions limit can be deducted with the purchase of greenhouse gas offsets, also known as carbon offsets. Offsets are credits generated in response to greenhouse gas reductions by a given party that can then be purchased by or exchanged with other parties to compensate for emissions in excess of defined emissions limits. New York City’s specific rules surrounding offset purchases will be determined through rule-making, with a mandate for strong consideration of environmental justice concerns. The role of offsets in subsequent compliance periods has yet to be determined.
RECs
In addition to offsets, building owners also have the option of purchasing unlimited renewable energy credits (RECs), also known as renewable energy certificates, to be deducted from their reported annual building emissions for electricity consumption. RECs are generated through the production of energy by renewable sources, per Local Law 97 and by convention denominated in megawatt hours (MWh). The bill requires that RECs represent energy that is deliverable to the NYC area (meaning no wind power credits from Texas, for example) and generated in the same year as the building emissions for which they are compensating. Local Law 97 also mandates that RECs must only be used for compliance with this particular bill and cannot be used in conjunction with other compliance mandates
(essentially: no double dipping).
Carbon Trading
Carbon trading represents another potential alternative compliance pathway. Local Law 97 mandates that the City study the development of a citywide emissions trading scheme (ETS) focused on greenhouse gas emissions from buildings by 2021. Emissions trading, also known as cap and trade, allows for covered parties – in this case, building owners – to balance their emissions with credits purchased from other parties whose building emissions fall under the emissions threshold. In practice, carbon trading might also allow for property owners with large portfolios –universities and major real estate companies, for example – to offset the poor performance of some of their buildings with exemplary performance from others. Tokyo currently has the world’s only buildings-based emissions trading scheme, and might serve as a model for New York City. As with greenhouse gas offsets, Local Law 97 mandates that the study incorporate environmental justice concerns so as to avoid localized pollution increases.
Hardship Waiver
Buildings facing financial difficulties, defended by the application of tax liens or property tax exemptions, may be temporarily exempt from Local Law 97.
Emissions Limit Adjustment
A building facing mandated emissions reductions in excess of 40% of its overall emissions may receive an emissions limit reduction equivalent to 70% of the building’s emissions limits in the 2018 calendar year.
Is everything set in stone?
No. While Local Law 97 establishes guidelines for limiting New York City’s building emissions, many of the specifics have yet to be ironed out. As noted, while the bill includes guidelines for greenhouse gas coefficients during the initial compliance period, subsequent standards will be set through rule-making. In addition, the emissions limits are subject to change and lack specific guidelines for 2035 onward. While there exists some ambiguity regarding specific policies moving forward, there are still concrete steps you can take today to move your building towards compliance.
Where can I find information on how to improve my building’s energy performance?
The Building Energy Exchange has developed a catalogue of published reports and case studies illuminating diverse potential compliance pathways for building owners. Specific resources of interest include: Tech Primers offer an introduction to leading-edge efficiency solutions limiting building energy use. High Performance Retrofit Track: Participant Profiles highlight successful building retrofits completed by some of New York City’s most forward looking building owners.
Turning Data Into Action utilizes New York City’s building energy usage bench-marking data to assess energy efficiency Pursuing Passive details the theoretical pathways for various building types. Retrofit of an actual mid-century post-war building to the Passive House standard. Better Steam Heat identifies opportunities for improving steam heating systems in large multi-family buildings Lighting the Way offers guidance on commercial lighting system upgrades that can reduce energy use. In addition to our resources, the Building Energy Exchange offers the Passive House Primer, a one-hour seminar on Passive House fundamentals and their application in the NYC market.
Outside of the Building Energy Exchange, other organizations include the New York City Retrofit Accelerator, supplying building owners with free advisory services to streamline the building improvement process. Building owners in need of financing assistance can work with New York City Energy Efficiency Corporation, a non-profit specialty finance company geared towards providing custom-tailored solutions to close financing gaps for clean energy projects. For those involved in the construction and building-maintenance trades, GPRO offers training in high-performance sustainability methods.
DBRS Report on C-PACE
DBRS Morningstar’s Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy ABS Sector Outlook: Stable Despite Coronavirus
June 30, 2020
Despite the ongoing impact of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) on the U.S. economy and on borrowers’ ability and willingness to repay outstanding debts, DBRS Morningstar’s outlook on the commercial property assessed clean energy (C-PACE) asset-backed securities (ABS) sector is stable. The coronavirus pandemic has had a limited effect on the C-PACE sector to date. With the closure of many nonessential businesses across the U.S., jobless claims have exceeded 47 million since mid-March, severely disrupting overall economic activity. We expect portfolios with exposure to hotel and retail properties to be the most negatively affected. Nonetheless, we expect limited credit deterioration in C-PACE securitizations due to the seniority of amortizing PACE assessments and underlying low loan-to-value (LTVs) ratios .
By providing short-term financial assistance, in the form of loans or grants related to the pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act has alleviated some economic difficulties on borrowers experiencing hardship—including consumers, small businesses, and large corporations.While we expect more pronounced performance deterioration in higher credit risk portfolios, the structural features and protections in typical C-PACE transactions will likely help mitigate the effect of deteriorating borrower credit. However, the uncertain magnitude of the economic impact related to the coronavirus may exert differing degrees of downward pressure on certain subordinate tranches.
In the context of this highly uncertain environment and in the interest of transparency, we revised our set of forward-looking macro-economic scenarios for select economies related to the coronavirus in the commentary Global Macroeconomic Scenarios: June Update, published on June 1, 2020. In our rating analysis, the moderate scenario is serving as the primary anchor for current ratings, while the adverse scenario serves as a benchmark for sensitivity analysis. This moderate scenario primarily considers two economic measures: declining gross domestic product (GDP) growth and increased unemployment levels. For asset classes where commercial-based obligors are the source of cash flows to repay the rated transaction, among other things, GDP provides the basis for measuring performance expectations.
Key highlights for the U.S. C-PACE and Single Asset Single Borrower (SASB) C-PACE asset classes include:
- We believe that increases in C-PACE assessment payment delinquencies will be limited. The combination of priority, low leverage resulting in non-acceleration of senior payment relatively small loan payments, and debt provide the borrower (property owner) with strong incentives to pay the C-PACE assessment rather than risk losing ownership of the asset through a tax foreclosure sale which would jeopardize other typically larger capital components of the project. In the unlikely event of a borrower’s failure to pay the C-PACE assessment when due, the same combination of factors provides the first mortgage lender or other junior capital provider with significant capital exposure in the transaction with a strong incentive to make a protective payment to retain its lien on the property.
- We also believe the increased risk of construction delays on properties undergoing new construction or gut rehab should not translate into a significant increase in C-PACE assessment payment delinquencies. Most of these properties have completion guarantees from one or more principals of the developer to help mitigate the construction completion risk. A liquidity reserve account is typically established and funded from the proceeds of the C-PACE financing at the time of the loan closing. Proceeds in this account are typically structured to cover C-PACE assessment payments during the property’s construction and stabilization period. Because of the capitalized interest and principal reserves, the first C-PACE assessment due date for payments paid from property operations is typically a year or more out, after the construction is expected to be completed.
- In the unlikely event that a payment default forces a foreclosure sale and change of ownership, the new property owner will be required to make delinquent payments, pay any late fees, and take over future payments. Because C-PACE loans do not accelerate, the new owner will not be responsible for an immediate payoff of the current outstanding loan balance. This important characteristic facilitates the transfer of ownership and continuity of payments. However, notwithstanding this benefit, in some cases, the new owner may choose to pay off the outstanding C-PACE loan at time of transfer.
- Finally, there are structural features of C-PACE securitizations that are beneficial to investors. For example, a typical structure includes one class of notes, whereby the ultimate payment of principal and interest mitigates liquidity concerns. In addition, as mentioned above, capitalized interest reserves and interest only periods during project stabilization also help to minimize default risk in early loan periods.
For more information, please see our commentary Global Macroeconomic Scenarios: Application to DBRS Morningstar Credit Ratings, published April 22, 2020.
New York State Legislation Bill Allowing C-Pace Financing for New Construction
by Patrick Dolan (US) and Ryan Graham (US) — September 7, 2020
To promote growth of renewable energy projects, the New York State Legislature recently passed bill A.7805/S.6523 (the “C-PACE Bill”), which will allow real estate developers and commercial property owners to obtain Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) financing for new construction projects. C-PACE programs are thought to be beneficial for cities, promoting energy efficiency, reducing energy costs and promoting local economic development.
Generally, PACE financing is an attractive financing option that allows property owners to obtain funds from pre-qualified private lenders for energy efficient building improvements. PACE programs are administered by state government policies that classify certain clean energy upgrades as public benefits.
New York’s Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (“C-PACE”) program is administered by the Energy Improvement Corporation (“EIC”), a state agency, and dates back to 2009. The program was updated in 2019 to allow commercial property owners the ability to access third-party financing on favorable terms. For more information on the C-PACE program as previously administered in New York, refer to our News Wire update from August 2019.
Prior to the passage of C-PACE Bill, C-PACE financing was available only to finance improvements to already existing buildings. Under the new bill, the C-PACE program has been expanded to allow C-PACE financing for new construction projects. In passing the C-PACE Bill, the New York State Assembly emphasized that commercial real estate developers often fail to use the newest and most energy efficient equipment in new construction projects, because they could not take advantage of C-PACE financing. By saving 0n construction costs, real estate developers have gradually passed costs on to local communities via higher energy costs, emissions and pollution. In updating New York’s C-PACE program, the New York State Legislature hopes that real estate developers will be able to incorporate more energy-efficient equipment in new construction projects and mitigate future direct and indirect costs to local communities.
Industry advocates have widely applauded the New York State Legislature for passing C-PACE Bill. In particular, industry advocates have emphasized that the C-PACE Bill will benefit the New York economy that has been greatly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent economic downturn, and they hope that the C-PACE Bill will lead to an increase in investment and provide more work for construction workers, engineers and architects.
Governor Cuomo is expected to sign the C-PACE Bill in the coming weeks. The text of the C-Pace Bill can be found here. For regular reports on new developments affecting energy efficiency and clean energy, subscribe to the Norton Rose Fulbright Project Finance News Wire here.
Biden Stocks Transition Team with Climate Experts
The President-Elect has Included those with Climate Experience Across a Wide Swath of Federal Agencies
by Adam Aton, Jean Chemnick, E&E News on November 14, 2020
From the Pentagon to the General Services Administration, President-elect Joe Biden has embedded climate-minded officials throughout his sprawling transition team. Climate experts, former Obama administration officials and green activists abound among the teams managing the transition for EPA; the Energy, Interior and Agriculture departments; and the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Unlike past transitions, officials with significant climate or clean energy experience also popup in departments like State, Defense, Treasury and Justice.
They’re even handling the transition at agencies that, so far, have been on the periphery of climate policy, like the Small Business Administration and the Federal Reserve. Of Biden’s 39 agency review teams, at least 19 have one or more officials with some climate background. Perhaps just as telling, many of the transition officials had a hand in the 2009 stimulus, to date the largest government investment in clean energy and the model for Biden’s climate plan. The teams include a cross section of union representatives, progressive policy experts, establishment loyalists, activist scholars, corporate envoys and technocrats.
It’s the latest test of the Biden team’s balancing act between progressives, whom it courted during the campaign, and the establishment veterans who have proliferated in the former vice president’s orbit for years. In the short term, some of the Biden transition’s biggest challenges will come from simply restaffing and rebuilding the agencies that were deconstructed under President Trump, said Aaron Weiss of the Center for Western Priorities. “These folks are going to be coming into departments that have, in many cases, been eviscerated,” he said, pointing to the exodus of scientists and career staffers from the federal government over the past four years.
EPA, for example, shed more than 700 scientists under Trump and had only filled about 350 of those positions as of January, according to a Washington Post analysis. “The amount of rebuilding that will need to be done is unprecedented,” Weiss said. The exit of so much essential staff over the last four years presents a challenge, said Tim Profeta, director of Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions. “But it’s also an opportunity in terms of recruiting new, motivated talented civil servants who would be dedicated to the mission of addressing climate change in the federal government,” he said.
Profeta helped lead the Climate 21 Project, or C21, which yesterday unveiled 300 pages of recommendations for a new administration to prepare for a full-court press on climate change (Greenwire, Nov. 11). The group’s suggestions cover 11 government offices, agencies and departments from the Office of Management and Budget to EPA to the State Department. It also calls for a new White House policy council to oversee work on climate across the federal agencies. The C21 plan was written in part by members of Biden’s transition team.
One is Joseph Goffman, serving on the EPA transition. He was EPA’s top lawyer on climate and air issues in the Obama administration, and he played a leading role in crafting the Clean Power Plan and regulations for methane from oil and gas operations. Another is Robert Bonnie, leading the transition at USDA. Bonnie was climate adviser to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack—himself a close Biden ally—and later served as the department’s undersecretary for natural resources and environment. The EPA landing team will be held by Patrice Simms of Earthjustice, an environmental lawyer who began his career at EPA and served in the Obama administration as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Environment and Natural Resources Division at the Justice Department. Also on the team are Cynthia Giles, who served as EPA’s top official for compliance and enforcement under Obama, and Ken Kopocis, its top chief for water quality.
The Interior team includes Maggie Thomas, who was a climate adviser to the Democratic presidential campaigns of Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, both of whom proposed ending Interior’s oil, gas and coal leasing. It also includes Kate Kelly, director of the Center for American Progress’ public lands program; Elizabeth Klein, an Interior veteran close with David Hayes, the deputy secretary under the Clinton and Obama administrations; Kevin Washburn, who was assistant secretary for Indian Affairs; and Bob Anderson, an attorney specializing in Native American law who was co-lead of Obama’s Interior transition.
The Energy Department team is led by Arun Majumdar, the initial director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, which started under Obama. Also on that team is the AFLCIO’s Brad Markell, a strong advocate of carbon capture technology. The CEQ team is headed by Cecilia Martinez, the environmental justice advocate who was a member of the Biden campaign’s climate engagement advisory council. She’ll be joined by Nikki Buffa, who was deputy chief of staff at Obama’s Interior, and Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Shara Mohtadi, who helped lead America’s Pledge and the group’s anti-coal work.
The Department of Justice team includes Richard Lazarus, a Harvard University professor who worked on the landmark Massachusetts v. EPA Supreme Court case, which in 2007 established EPA’s obligation to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.Earlier this year he published a book called “The Rule of Five” about the people and issues that shaped that case (Greenwire, Sept. 14).
Sue Biniaz, the State Department’s top attorney on climate change under four presidents, is a member of State’s landing team. She’s credited with saving the Paris Agreement at least twice by supplying diplomatic words in late-night scrums at climate conferences. That helped the U.S. negotiating team bring home a deal that wouldn’t require Senate ratification while satisfying other global players that the agreement would still have teeth. “Everybody always used to say that Sue knows where every comma is in the Paris Agreement,” said Nathaniel Keohane, senior vice president at the Environmental Defense Fund and a veteran of Obama’s White House.
The Treasury team includes Andy Green, now of the Center for American Progress, who worked on pricing climate risk as a lawyer for the Securities and Exchange Commission. Another Treasury transition official is Marisa Lago, who handled climate finance under the Obama administration and oversaw adaptation projects as chair of the New York City Planning Commission.
The Department of Transportation team includes Patty Monahan, a member of the California Energy Commission and a vocal advocate of electric vehicles, as well as Austin Brown, who was assistant director for clean energy and transportation in Obama’s Office of Science and Technology Policy.
The team for the General Services Administration—which oversees federal procurement and will figure heavily into Biden’s plan to de carbonize the government—includes Josh Sawislak, a former CEQ official who is now a senior adviser to the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.
The Small Business Administration team includes Cliff Kellogg, executive director of the C-PACE Alliance, which works on financing energy efficiency and renewables projects.
The Defense Department team includes Sharon Burke, the former DOD assistant secretary who has focused on climate change’s impact on the military.
The Department of Homeland Security team includes Craig Fugate, the Obama administration’s Federal Emergency Management Agency director.
The team for the Federal Reserve includes Amanda Fischer, a vocal advocate of the Fed accounting for climate risk and a former chief of staff to progressive Rep. Katie Porter (DCalif.)- The transition team for the United Nations includes Leonardo Martinez-Diaz, global director of the World Resources Institute’s sustainable finance center. He was formerly the Treasury Department’s deputy assistant secretary for energy and environment. And the National Security Council team is headed by Jeff Prescott, who published an oped last year comparing Trump’s climate denial to the administrative failures that led to the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.
Reporters Maxine Joselow, Thomas Frank, Avery Ellfeldt and Benjamin Storrow contributed
- 1
- 2